A Comparative Review of Evidence-Based Treatments for Adults with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD)

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Morin, Michelle

Issue Date

2025-05

Type

Capstone

Language

en

Keywords

obsessive compulsive disorder , exposure and response prevention , metacognitive therapy , acceptance and commitment therapy , cognitive therapy , evidence-based practice , treatment failure , treatment outcome

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Alternative Title

Abstract

Obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) is a highly distressing psychiatric disorder that has significant impact on quality of life and increased risk for suicide. Presentations of this disorder include repetitive obsessive thoughts and images of personally distressing content, and mental or behavioural compulsions. This disorder is estimated to affect up to 4% of the general population. Current treatment guidelines advise the use of Exposure and Response Prevention (ERP) as the first line treatment, with more severe OCD cases recommended for inpatient administration of behavioural therapies. However, there exists people with OCD who do not benefit solely from behavioural therapies due to several factors including accessibility, tolerability and poor treatment response. This paper provides a comparative analysis of evidenced-based interventions for adults with OCD, with a focus on ERP, Metacognitive Therapy (MCT) and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT). This analysis synthesizes results from randomized controlled trials exploring treatment effectiveness within evidence-based psychotherapies and discusses mechanisms of change within each modality. The findings support that MCT and ACT may offer viable alternatives to ERP and emphasize future research directions to determine which client characteristics may be moderating treatment response.

Description

Citation

Publisher

License

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
openAccess

Journal

Volume

Issue

PubMed ID

DOI

ISSN

EISSN