Theorization and the Third Way of Knowing: Implications for Psychotherapeutic Practice

cityu.schoolDivision of Arts and Sciences
cityu.siteVancouver, BC
cityu.site.countryCanada
dc.contributor.authorFang, Jun Hua
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-15T23:14:04Z
dc.date.available2016-08-15T23:14:04Z
dc.date.issued2016-06
dc.descriptionNo thesis date on title-page; thesis date from Agreement form.
dc.description.abstractThis literature review is divided into five chapters in which each chapter explains a process that why the conventional theorization in psychotherapy is problematic and why the third way of knowing practice in psychotherapy is necessary. Specifically, Chapter 1 goes back to the sources of the conventional psychotherapy approach-theorization and introduces its history; Chapter 2 is a critique of the theorization approach in psychotherapy; Chapter 3 is a description of the "third way of knowing" and its features. Chapter 4 is a delineation of the third way of knowing practice in psychotherapy; Chapter 5 is my application of the third way of knowing practice in psychotherapy
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11803/394
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisher.institutionCity University of Seattle (CityU)
dc.subjectthird way of knowing
dc.subjecttheorization
dc.titleTheorization and the Third Way of Knowing: Implications for Psychotherapeutic Practice
dc.typeThesis
thesis.degree.disciplineCounseling
thesis.degree.grantorCity University of Seattle (CityU)
thesis.degree.levelMasters
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Arts
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
JunHuaFangThesis2016.pdf
Size:
400.55 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: