How precise is forensic pathology in differentiating between accidental and homicidal death
Loading...
Authors
Grano, Rudy
Issue Date
2006
Type
Thesis
Language
en
Keywords
Forensic science
Alternative Title
Abstract
Although it is generally of little to no importance, forensic evidence is present everywhere. However, at the scene of a crime, forensic science can be of vital importance. The police can be led to the offender by forensic evidence in cases of homicide. In fact, forensic evidence plays a critical part in the prosecution and defense of the defendant. On the other hand, there are a number of downfalls in the use of forensic evidence, both prior to the evidence being brought to court and in court proceedings. Thus, accuracy is crucial when forensic evidence is used to make determinations of whether a person's death is accidental or homicidal.
Although forensic science evidence is at the scene of every crime in varying degrees, the use during cases of homicide and accidental death are focuses upon in this paper. The value and use of DNA (Deoxyribunuleic Acid) evidence as well as other types of forensic evidence are discussed along with the surrounding arguments in relationship to their use are discussed. DNA is more than simply an interesting topic, because DNA evidence has been used to prove guilt or innocence a number of times. At one time forensic evidence appeared to be infallible. However, criticism concerning forensic evidence has occurred. Fortunately, if forensic science evidence is properly used and presented, it is capable of succeeding in differentiating between accidental and homicidal death. Cases where deaths are possible homicides or accidental death are discussed.